Skip to main content

Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says

in News 1 min read

In this Education Week article, assistant editor Alyson Klein examines whether districts should tie provider payments to student outcomes, drawing on a new WestEd evaluation commissioned by the Center for Outcomes Based Contracting (OBC) across eight districts in California, Florida, Mississippi and Texas. One district leader credits close, ongoing communication with providers for a smooth partnership, while a provider interviewed points to the financial risk of factors outside its control.

Related Posts

  • Outcomes Based Contracting Requires Not Just Accountability, but Partnership

    Outcomes Based Contracting Requires Not Just Accountability, but Partnership

    Curriculum Associates CEO Kelly Sia on why outcomes based contracting depends on partnership, not just accountability.

  • Us Dept of Education location

    Can a Letter From Washington Actually Change How Schools Buy Technology?

    Dr. Brittany Miller joins EdSurge to unpack new federal edtech guidance urging schools to buy for outcomes, not screen time.

  • Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    New WestEd research finds early promise for outcomes based contracting, but can't yet separate contract effects from coaching support.