In this Government Technology article, Julia Gilban-Cohen examines what outcomes based contracting for edtech actually changes in practice, drawing on findings from the Digital Promise report. Rather than framing OBC as a money-back guarantee, the piece explores how the model creates mutual accountability between districts and vendors, encourages districts to define who a tool is for before purchasing it, and builds the implementation infrastructure that makes edtech efficacy testable in the first place. The result: fewer tools, more intentional use, and classrooms where students can articulate exactly why they are using a product and what they are working to improve.
Beyond the Buzz: What Outcomes Based Contracting Actually Changes in Edtech
Related Posts
-
September 11, 2026 | News
Outcomes Based Contracting Requires Not Just Accountability, but Partnership
Curriculum Associates CEO Kelly Sia on why outcomes based contracting depends on partnership, not just accountability.
-
August 26, 2026 | News
Can a Letter From Washington Actually Change How Schools Buy Technology?
Dr. Brittany Miller joins EdSurge to unpack new federal edtech guidance urging schools to buy for outcomes, not screen time.
-
August 10, 2026 | News
Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results
New WestEd research finds early promise for outcomes based contracting, but can't yet separate contract effects from coaching support.