Skip to main content

Beyond the Buzz: What Outcomes Based Contracting Actually Changes in Edtech

in News 1 min read

In this Government Technology article, Julia Gilban-Cohen examines what outcomes based contracting for edtech actually changes in practice, drawing on findings from the Digital Promise report. Rather than framing OBC as a money-back guarantee, the piece explores how the model creates mutual accountability between districts and vendors, encourages districts to define who a tool is for before purchasing it, and builds the implementation infrastructure that makes edtech efficacy testable in the first place. The result: fewer tools, more intentional use, and classrooms where students can articulate exactly why they are using a product and what they are working to improve.

Read More

Related Posts

  • Outcomes Based Contracting Requires Not Just Accountability, but Partnership

    Outcomes Based Contracting Requires Not Just Accountability, but Partnership

    Curriculum Associates CEO Kelly Sia on why outcomes based contracting depends on partnership, not just accountability.

  • Us Dept of Education location

    Can a Letter From Washington Actually Change How Schools Buy Technology?

    Dr. Brittany Miller joins EdSurge to unpack new federal edtech guidance urging schools to buy for outcomes, not screen time.

  • Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    Proof Points: Paying Vendors for Student Results

    New WestEd research finds early promise for outcomes based contracting, but can't yet separate contract effects from coaching support.